Digital Due Diligence

New York     212 380 8057

  • Home
  • Research
  • Services
    • Equity Research
    • M&A Due Diligence
    • Online Joint Venture Analysis
    • Bespoke Research
  • Newsletter
  • About
    • Press
  • Contact
  • Digital Due Diligence Daily
    Blog · Research

Coworking coast-to-coast, a social media promotion disaster, and paywalls as tote bags…

By Byrne Hobart On February 6, 2012
Includes: GOOG • MSFT • NYT • QNST

Google Updates Google is using third-party sites for rich snippets. This is an important precedent: it’s one of the few cases where Google gives up brand-blessed real estate for non-brand sites. There are some rumblings that Google’s privacy policies may violate HIPAA, but Google appears to fall outside the purview of that law. Google released a…

Continue Reading →

Why Google is Overinvesting in Social

By Byrne Hobart On January 30, 2012
Includes: FBOOK • GOOG • TWIT

A hardy band of Google competitors—engineers at Facebook, Twitter, and Myspace—have built “Don’t be Evil,” a tool that basically recreates the Search+ experience with social media sites other than Google+. This concretely illustrates one of the lurking problems with Google’s search and social integration: it’s really bad for the search experience. There are a…

Continue Reading →

More infographic victims, simplifying the Lumascape, and a new way to trade off of Twitter data

By Byrne Hobart On January 30, 2012
Includes: AAPL • AMZN • FBOOK • GOOG • NFLX • TGT • TWIT • VOCS

Google Updates Danny Sullivan has much more information on the “Don’t be Evil” tool. He actually makes a pretty good case for the bookmarklet as a genuinely useful piece of software: if it weren’t for the life-or-death struggle search and social companies, this kind of thing would be an obvious feature to add. Google may be 

Continue Reading →

What will SecondMarket do without Facebook, Google’s rough quarter, and what phantom impressions.

By Byrne Hobart On January 23, 2012
Includes: AMZN • BZFD • FBOOK • GOOG • GRPN • RIMM • SCOR • SMKT

Google Updates Google’s Q4 earnings disappointed investors—they had higher ad clicks and lower costs per click (for the first time in a while). It’s hard to understand exactly what happened here, but John Ebbert at Ad Exchanger has an interesting theory: Google may be funneling traffic to PPC advertisers whose cookies can be used by…

Continue Reading →

SOPA Fallout: Is Lobbying a Core Competency for Web Companies?

By Byrne Hobart On January 23, 2012
Includes: FBOOK • GOOG • NWS

A group of large media conglomerates banded together to lobby against a bill pushed by another large group of media conglomerates. In a victory for democracy, one of these enormous self-interested groups got exactly what it wanted from Congress.

That’s not great news.

At best, it’s the status quo: whenever two large interest groups collide,…

Continue Reading →

Google Can Win Personalization, or Lose Search

By Byrne Hobart On January 17, 2012
Includes: 4SQ • ACOM • AMZN • FBOOK • GOOG • LNKD • MSFT • TWTR

When Google announced Search, plus Your World, they made a dramatic decision: they’re embracing the paradigm of a web of people, rather than a web of verbs. And it’s a dangerous move.

There are two broad strategies for improving search engines: making them more aware of intents, or making them more aware of preferences. Most…

Continue Reading →

Mashable’s irresponsible reporting, the social data tiff, and D&B’s content farm

By Byrne Hobart On January 17, 2012
Includes: AMZN • DNB • FBOOK • GILT • GOOG • IGT • INSP • MSFT • SPTF • TRIP • TWTR • WBMD

Why Infographics Still Work

This horrible Mashable article reveals why infographics are still such a powerful marketing tool. The author of the article clearly has no idea what any of this means (for example, at one point she seems to think that the amount of money Facebook is raising from the IPO is also somehow an…

Continue Reading →

The Black-Hat Conundrum: Maintain a Monopoly, or Subsidize Spam?

By Byrne Hobart On January 9, 2012
Includes: GOOG

It’s popular to cast black-hat SEO in moral terms. The popular understanding (made popular by Google), is that black-hat techniques are necessarily bad for the Internt, even if they benefit the spammer. That puts them squarely in the “immoral” category. But as this lengthy analysis from Aaron Wall illustrates, there’s another view: on all fronts, Google…

Continue Reading →

Direct response versus branding, SEO agency pricing data, and “Google’s superior SEO”…

By Byrne Hobart On January 9, 2012
Includes: AIRBN • AOL • EBAY • FBOOK • GRPN • TWIT

Is Online Advertising Just Good for Direct Response?

Seth Godin notes that easily-analyzed, numbers-driven direct response ads are the dominant form of online ads, which has some negative side effects. But a Vizu survey indicates that advertisers will spend more online dollars on branding than direct response in the coming year.

What gives? First, there’s sampling: Vizu…

Continue Reading →

Google Accidentally Illustrates the SEO’s Agent/Principal Conflict

By Byrne Hobart On January 3, 2012
Includes: GOOG • JCP

Google has just gotten slammed for apparently subsidizing a huge number of low-quality blog posts, all linking to the Google Chrome download page. Take away the Google brand name, and it’s a classic low-quality SEO campaign: each blog post sticks to a pretty simple template, and is clearly written in order minimize the amount of effort…

Continue Reading →
Page 3 of 1212345...10...»Last »
  • Recent Research

    • VIPShop Branded Query Volume on Baidu Down 7% Quarterly
    • How Qihoo 360 Won the Browser War in China
    • Battle of the Southeast Asian travel portals
    • Will Sina Weibo threaten Twitter as the world’s dominant microblogging network?
    • Weighing the Risks, Rewards of VoyagerMoinsCher.com’s Widget Strategy
  • Digital Due Diligence Weekly

    Each monday morning before the opening bell, you'll get coverage of key developments affecting publicly traded companies with significant search engine exposure.




    unsubscribe from list
© Digital Due Diligence 2013. Disclaimer.